[Gmecm] Re: Fuel Economy

[romans at starstream.net (Mark Romans)]

I was responding to Darrell <ndarrell@telusplanet.net> when he said...

"Cowen: (and all)

Well, you are right, second times the charm.  Thank you for 
responding anyway, and getting a little action going on the thread.  
A lot of this information will be useful, thanks to all who posted on 
the topic.  Some of it went way over my head, but I'm here to learn.

Interesting idea about using a WBO2 sensor, has anyone actually tried 
this?  I mean replacing a stock NB with a WB on a stock computer?  
That in combination with changing the voltage threshold may allow you 
to set the AFR to a slightly leaner mixture overall."


Mark



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "gary" <gas-@charter.net>
To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Gmecm] Re: Fuel Economy


> Mark, maybe you missed a previous post of mine.  If you didn't, then 
> you recall I stated (in so many words) you CAN replace/simulate a 
> NB O2 output with a WB sensor. PROVIDING, you use software/
> hardware from this source: 
> http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/index.html
> 
> As it is true digital technology unlike ANY other WB product available, 
> despite posts to the contrary some weeks ago in a related thread. 
> 
> GAS
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Romans" <romans@starstream.net>
> To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 6:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gmecm] Re: Fuel Economy
> 
> 
>> No No No!   You can't run a wide band in place of a narrow band.
>> The Wide band puts out a somewhat linear 0-5 v output.
>> The narrow band puts out a non-linear 0-1 v output.
> _______________________________________________
> Gmecm mailing list
> Gmecm@diy-efi.org
> http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/gmecm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.diy-efi.org/pipermail/gmecm/attachments/20050916/ac488795/attachment.htm