Re: Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU

["Thomas Matthews" <tmatthew@stny.lrun.com>]

It uses a clip in arrangement.
----- Original Message -----
From: "nacelp" <nacelp@bright.net>
To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU


> Is it a thread in (pipe thread?), or one that uses a clip to hold it in?.
> Grumpy
>
>
> > I grabbed one of those small IAT sensors too. It was out of the airbox
of
> an
> > 88 Quad 4, and the sensor side was smaller than an SMD cap. But it
looked
> > factory.
> > I thought I would try it in place of my 89 OEM TPI sensor, which is
> encased
> > in brass. Haven't tested it yet though.
> > Tom
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Scot Sealander" <Sealand@clarityconnect.com>
> > To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Sensor response times; was 89 F-body ECU
> >
> >
> > > nacelp wrote:
> > >
> > > > Has any one tried comparing CTS/IAT/MAT/TTS response times?.
> > >
> > > Not yet.  But one day while looking for sensors at the junkward,
> > > I came across what must be an aftermarket air temp sensor.
> > > It was made a little different from the GM sensors.  It reads
> > > the same, but has a very small element for the thermister.
> > >
> > > Now I am assuming that the small element means less thermal
> > > mass (faster response), but I may be wrong....
> > >
> > > Just have to test some.
> > >
> > > Scot Sealander
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

> >
>

>
>
>