Re: First GN chip

["nacelp" <nacelp@bright.net>]

Kinda making a word game of it.
If you start with alot and take some out that is retarding.
If you refer to having added timing, then yes it was advanced.
Either way as air temp rises, you'll want to lessen the total amount of
timing.
Les Grumpy


> Air temp isnt a retard table, its an advance table. I guess you could
merely
> start with a lower than normal timing map and advance at lower temps. As
you
> reach higher temps the value would fall back to the original lower than
> normal value. Did that even make sense?  ie: 100% load table might be:
> 2400 RPm and up... 23  25  24  23  23  22  20  19
> but using IAT might be 22  23  22  21  21  20  20  17