Re: Injector Duty cycle calculations

[timsiford@hushmail.com]

--Hushpart_boundary_vugnPIwcWXNzkIAymZOkwgIjGZVkrcXd
Content-type: text/plain

Very cool.

Tim


At Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:06:36 -0400, Scott Knight <scott@scottknight.com> 
wrote:

>
>To revisit a very old topic here, I did a little experimenting with
>Diacom recently and did in fact verify what I mentioned as second hand
>info here...
>
>> Am I missing something here?  Is Diacom reporting wrongly?
>
>Actually it is.  I did a steady state run while out on the Ohio turnpike
>with the 95 Impala SS (can't vouch for any other PCM/ECM readings) and
>Diacom version 2.85 where it was very flat and the cruise control was
>set at 75 mph.  What I found was very interesting in that Diacom truly
>does report the pulse width at half of what the other scanners I have 
>do
>(PCMcomm from Dave H. and TTS DataMaster).  Just though you would like
>to know since it seemed to be news to everyone but me at the time.
>Anyone else notice this with other vehicles or is it something specific
>to the way Diacom scales the info out of the 8051 and newer PCMs? (yeah,
>I realize that Diacom reads the OBD-II PCM in 'legacy' mode)
>
>Later dates.
>--
>Scott Knight  mailto:scott@scottknight.com
>http://www.scottknight.com/ IRC:SS396man
>'00 White Grand Prix GTP
>'95 Black Impala SS
>'94 Ducati 900SS CR
>
>----- End of forwarded message from owner-gmecm@diy-efi.org -----
>--------------------------------------------------------------------

>
--Hushpart_boundary_vugnPIwcWXNzkIAymZOkwgIjGZVkrcXd--


IMPORTANT NOTICE:  If you are not using HushMail, this message could have been read easily by the many people who have access to your open personal email messages.
Get your FREE, totally secure email address at http://www.hushmail.com.