Re: MAF and 89 Vet stuff

["Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>]

In the past I'd just used a 89 memcal, and was fine.
Last week had a car that I tried writting 89 code on a 87 memcal, and it
wouldn't start.   Would up editing his and he was happy.

Make any sense needing 89 memcal to do the switch?.
Grumpy
  Yes, did undo 9th inj....




> If someone has an 86 and it's an automatic I would strongly recommend that
> they convert to 89 code because it's much better supported and runs better
> and eliminates the cold start injector.  If they have a 4+3 they are
> screwed.
> Mark
> From: "TK" <terryk@foothill.net>

> > hey Mark,
> > Is the 86 Y body the same as anything else? I don't remember working on
> it.
> > I think that's the 7703 ECM.
> >
> > Terry