Re: 165 to late MAF

[PCMdoc <PCMdoc@surfree.com>]

Ken Kelly (#2),

	This sure sounds different from grumpy's numbers. He had 

1.3 CFM = .75 Gm/sec that would be 
1.73 CFM = 1 Gm/sec or
1 CFM = .577 Gm/sec 

		Ken Kelly (#1)

Ken Kelly wrote:
> 
> So, .975 gm/s = 1 CFM? (Yes/no? I've forgotten my math.. sigh.)
> 
> I'm thinking of making a digital flow bench that actually shows CFM, using
> the MAF sensor, a simple MCU (like a Basic Stamp or something) and an LED
> display.
> 
> Ken Kelly (#2)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gmecm@esl.eng.ohio-state.edu
> [mailto:owner-gmecm@esl.eng.ohio-state.edu]On Behalf Of Bruce Plecan
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 9:47 PM
> To: gmecm@efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
> Subject: Re: 165 to late MAF
> 
> Per normal here at CSH, HQ
> Bass ackwards but
> 
> 1.3 CFM can make 1HP
> .75 grams per sec, can make 1 HP
> so
> 1.3 CFM=.75 grm/sec., approx
> Grumpy
> 
> | Ken, is it possible to convert these values to CFM? (Thought: digital flow
> | bench??)
> |
> | Ken Kelly #2
> 
> | Tom,
> | This is the stock 95 Camaro Freq to Air Flow table.
> |
> | Ken