Re: 4.6L Ford MAF was Re: Heat crazed mad scientist

["Programmer" <nwester@eidnet.org>]

Made the same mistake--MAP sensors are freq'd and MAF's are voltage.
Opposite
of GM stuff. Nice to see some input from Mike...think we should start a
FordECM site ?
Lyndon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Wesley <mwesley@mediaone.net>
To: gmecm@diy-efi.org <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Date: June 5, 2000 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: 4.6L Ford MAF was Re: Heat crazed mad scientist


>
>> Yes the maf is frequency  only downfall it seems is the have no burn
off...
>> hence gett dirty and hinder driveability...
>
>Ford MAF's are all voltage output.
>
>
>> Nother interesting tid bit... allmost all ford guy's transfer to maf
because
>> of driveability and power.. us gmers change to sd??? Could be just
options..
>
>One reason people switch to MAF is the ease of tuneability over the Ford
>SD system and the range a Ford MAF (when tweaked) can have. The MAF I
>run on one of my Ford engines can measure about 5100 Kg/hr of massflow
>which is quite alot. You don't even really need to do anything to the
>ECM, just pop in new injectors and the MAF and your good to go.
>
>Mike....
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
>in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org