Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)

["JN" <jwn@sgi.net>]

Really?  Isn't a bigger headache to switch to a 730?  Maybe I am a bit naive
but it seems that 165 MAF ecm is fairly simple.  Right now my goal is to get
it close and not perfect.  Since I know nothing about speed density, I plan
to stick with the MAF.

Jason Norris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>
To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Part Throttle tuning for MAF (was MAF tables have a max of 255)


>
> Avoid the headache, switch to a 730.
> IMO.
> Unless your switching over to a late model pcm, with a 3.5" MAF
> Bruce
>
>
> > Please let me know what you find out since I have an 89 Corvette that I
am
> > building a 396 for with a Super Ram.
> > Jason Norris
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org