Re: Contribution to GMECM (AFR Modifier.exe)

[timsiford@hushmail.com]

Dave,

Do you mean .... am I grabbing the actual value in the PROM for stoichiometric 
AFR and using that value?

Currently, I am not using the value stored in the PROM.  I am just using 
a constant of 14.7.  I currently have it set up as a constant and I will 
just turn it into a property of my BIN class (if that's what you mean).

Tim

At Fri, 24 Nov 2000 23:35:29 -0800, "Dave Zug" <dzug@delanet.com> wrote:

>
>geeze sorry that was meant to not bug the whole list... I think everyone 
>is
>sleeping off the turkey bellies anyway. ;-)
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Dave Zug <dzug@delanet.com>
>To: <gmecm@diy-efi.org>
>Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 11:08 PM
>Subject: Re: Contribution to GMECM (AFR Modifier.exe)
>
>
>> A note and/or question...
>>
>> Do you incorporate the BASE STOICHIOMETRIC AFR setting in the final 
>PE AFR
>> values you put out?
>>
>> If the intent of the graph is to put a guideline based on only the 
>2
>tables,
>> you might say that in some text somewhere.
>>
>> just brainstorming (and tweaking the AFR section of my 'TILZ
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------
>--
>> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
>> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-
>efi.org
>>
>>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------
>To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
>in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
>