Re: BIG WinBin vs TunerCat discrepencies

["Bruce Plecan" <nacelp@bright.net>]

Ever think to double check, and see if everyone is one the same page?.  That
is using the same bin?.  If not then there might be differences.
Grumpy


> > { >FELP!  FELP!
> > { >I thought that these discrepencies were just limited to
> what I
> initially
> > { >mentioned; namely, ...
> > { >Coolant fan temps
> > { >Injector flow rate
> > { >Feul cutoff and return (RPM)
> > { >Cold, Warm, and Hot closed loop timers
> > { >But, there are much bigger fish in these waters :-(
> > { >The VE tables (both) contain the same values ... BUT IN
> THE WRONG
> CELLS!!!!
> > { >Has anyone seen this before?  It looks like the tables
> are turned
> sideways.
> > { >The values in the 20kpa column for rpms 1600-4800
> inside TunerCat are
> the
> > { >values in WinBin for 1600rpms for 20-100kpa!!!!  What
> the?
> Furthermore,
> > { >TunerCat has this table populated to 5600rpms and
> WinBin only goes to
> > { >4800rpms.
> > { >This discrepency is also true with the spark tables ...
> but, to a much
> > { >bigger degree.  The tables don't even contain the same
> values :-(
> > { >
> > { >Does ANYONE know what is up with this?  FELP!
> > { >
> > { >Tim


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org