Re: Ported MAF

[Ken Kelly <PCMdoc@surfree.com>]

?? Why another MAF? just a port to bypass the MAF. One
problem will be that the PCM has a 512gm/sec limit on the
internal variable.

		Ken 

WEG1192@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 08/12/2000 11:30:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> amattei@mindspring.com writes:
> 
> << Ported MAF >>
> 
> Anyone considered installing two stock MAF sensors in parallel side by side
> and then multiplying the gms/sec numbers by two in the ECM calcualtions?
> Would this work to give you more airflow at less pressure drop? All you would
> have to do is make sure the air split was done right to give equal pressure
> drop through each one. Leave one MAF connected to the ECM as normal and the
> other unconnected as a dummy sensor.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo@lists.diy-efi.org